RESMETHRIN
Carcinogen And Pesticide Branch 1. General Discussion
Recently the OSHA Analytical Laboratory received a set of field samples
with a request for the analysis of resmethrin. These air samples had been
collected on 1.1.2. Toxic effects (This section is for information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy). In rats the acute oral LD50 for resmethrin (technical material) is 4240 mg/kg. In rabbits the acute dermal LD50 is 2500 mg/kg. In guinea pigs skin sensitization is negative (Ref. 5.1.). 1.1.3. Potential workplace exposure Resmethrin is an insecticide. No estimate of the extent of worker exposure could be found at this time. 1.1.4. Physical properties and other descriptive information (Ref. 5.2. through 5.5.)
1.2. Limit defining parameters The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 10.1 ng per injection. This is the amount of analyte which will give a peak whose height is approximately five times the baseline noise. (See Figure 2.) 2. Sampling Procedure (Ref. 5.6. and 5.7.)
2.1.2. 2.2. Reagents None 2.3. Sampling technique
2.3.2. Attach the sampling device to the sampling pump inlet with flexible, plastic tubing so that the large, front section of the device is exposed directly to the atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front of the sampler. 2.3.3. Attach the sampler vertically (large end down) to the worker's collar or within the breathing zone in such a manner that it does not impede work performance.
2.3.4. After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sampling
device and reseal the tube with plastic 2.3.5. Submit at least one blank for each set of samples. Handle the blank in the same manner as the samples, except no air is drawn through it. 2.3.6. Report any possible interferences to the laboratory at the time the samples are submitted. 2.3.7. Ship samples as soon as possible in a suitable container designed to prevent damage in transit. 2.3.9. Submit bulk samples for analysis in a container separate from the air samples. 2.4. Extraction efficiency
Three "A-portions" from
Extraction Efficiency of Resmethrin
2.5. Retention efficiency
Three
Retention Efficiency of Resmethrin
2.6. Sample storage
Three
Storage Test of Resmethrin
2.7. Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.2. The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min. 2.8. Interferences (sampling) It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection of resmethrin. Suspected interferences should be reported to the laboratory. 2.9. Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.2. Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area being sampled. 3. Analytical Procedure (Ref. 5.7.)
3.1.2. Volumetric flasks, pipets, and syringes of various convenient sizes for preparing standards, making dilutions and making injections.
3.1.3. A high performance liquid chromatograph equipped with a variable
wavelength UV detector, manual or automatic injector, and strip chart
recorder. A 3.1.4. An HPLC column capable of separating resmethrin from any interferences. A (25 cm × 4.6 mm i.d.) Du Pont Zorbax ODS (5 micron) column was used for this evaluation.
3.1.5. An electronic integrator, or some other suitable method for
measuring detector response. The
3.1.6. Glass vials,
3.1.7. Glass vials, 3.2. Reagents
3.2.2. Water, HPLC grade. A Millipore 3.2.5. Resmethrin, (EPA Reference standard #6055). A 99.5% pure standard from EPA was used for this evaluation. 3.3. Standard preparation
Prepare two stock standard solutions by adding acetonitrile to preweighed
amounts of resmethrin (20 to 30 mg) in 3.4. Sample preparation
3.4.2. Add 2.0 ml of acetonitrile to each vial and seal with rubber lined caps. 3.4.3. Allow the samples to extract for one hour with occasional vigorous shaking.
3.4.4. Where necessary for automation, transfer aliquots of samples to
3.5. Analysis
3.5.2. Chromatogram (See Figure 1.) 3.5.3. Intersperse the analytical standards, including a detection limit standard, with the samples in the analytical sequence. 3.6. Interferences (analytical)
3.6.2. Retention time alone is not proof of chemical identity. Confirmation of chemical identity by other means such as GC Mass Spectrometry, detector response ratioing or chromatography by an alternate column should be sought when possible. 3.7. Calculations
3.7.2. Use an external or internal standard procedure to prepare a calibration curve using analytical standards over a range of concentrations (See Figure 4). Bracket the samples with analytical standards. 3.7.3. Construct a calibration curve by plotting detector response versus standard concentration. (See Figure 4.) 3.7.4. Determine the concentration of resmethrin in each section of a sample from the calibration curve. If resmethrin is found on the backup section, add it to the amount on the front section. Make blank corrections for each section before adding the results together. 3.7.5. The air concentration is then determined by:
3.8. Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.2. Avoid skin contact with all solvents. 3.8.3. Wear safety glasses in the laboratory at all times. 4. Recommendation for Further Study A fully validated sampling and analytical method should be developed.
![]()
Figure 1. Chromatogram of Resmethrin
Figure 2. Detection limit of Analytical Procedure for Resmethrin
Figure 3. UV Scan of Resmethrin
Figure 4. Calibration Curve of Resmethrin
Figure 5. 5. References
5.2 Ouellett, R. P. and King, J. A.; "Chemical Week Pesticides Register";
5.3. Wiswesser, W. J., Ed.; "Pesticide Index", 5th ed.; Entomological Society of America: College Park, MD, 1976; p 198. 5.4. Watts, R. R., Ed.; "Analytical Reference Standards and Supplemental Data for Pesticides and Other Organic Compounds"; Analyt ical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Toxicology Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, Revised 1980; p 85.
5.5. Tatken, R. L. and Lewis, R. J. Sr., Ed.; "Registry of Toxic Effects
of Chemical Substances"; U. S. Department of Health and Human Services:
Cincinnati, OH, 1986; DDH(NIOSH) Publication No.
5.6. "Industrial Hygiene Technical Manual"; OSHA Instruction CPL 5.7 Burright, D.; "Carbaryl (Sevin)"; Method #58, Organic Methods Evaluations Branch, OSHA Analytical Laboratory: Salt Lake City, UT, July 1987; unpublished. |