Thiophanate-methyl
Method number: |
PV2058 |
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
Target Concentration: |
0.4 mg/m3 (arbitrary) There is no OSHA permissible
exposure level (PEL) or ACGIH threshold limit value (TLV) for thiophanate-methyl. |
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through glass fiber
filters. Samples are extracted with acetonitrile and analyzed by high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) using an ultraviolet (UV) detector. |
|
Recommended air volume and sampling rate: |
240 L at 1.0 L/min |
|
Detection limit of the overall procedure (based on the recommended air
volume and the analytical detection limit): |
10 µg/m3 |
|
Status of method: |
Stopgap method. This method has been only partially evaluated and is
presented for information and trial use. |
|
Date: January 1989 (final) |
Chemist: Duane Lee |
Carcinogen And Pesticide Branch
OSHA Analytical Laboratory
Salt Lake City, Utah
1. General Discussion
1.1. Background
1.1.1. History of procedure The OSHA Analytical Laboratory received a set of air
samples requesting the analysis of thiophanate-methyl. The samples had been collected on
glass fiber filters with air volumes of about 240 liters. This report describes the
analytical method developed.
1.1.2. Toxic effects (This section is for information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy.)
The acute oral LD50 in rats has been reported to be 7500
mg/kg and 6640 mg/kg. (Ref. 5.1. and 5.2.)
1.1.3. Potential workplace exposure
Thiophanate-methyl has a broad spectrum of plant disease control in vegetables, fruit,
turf, soybeans, peanuts, almonds, celery (Ref 5.2.). No estimate of worker exposure to
thiophanate-methyl could be found.
1.1.4. Physical properties (Ref. 5.1. to 5.3.)
Molecular weight: |
342.42 |
Molecular formula: |
C12H14N 4O4S2 |
CAS #: |
23564-05-8 |
IMIS number: |
D347 |
Melting point: |
168°C with decomposition |
Solubility: |
soluble in acetone, methanol, chloroform, acetonitrile; slightly soluble in other organics; insoluble in water |
Chemical name: |
Dimethyl ((1,2-phenylene) bis-(iminocarbonothioyl)} bis {carbamate} |
Synonyms: |
Cercobin-M, Mildothane, Topsin H, Labilite |
Description: |
colorless crystalline solid |
UV scan: |
Figure 1. |
Structure: |
|
1.2. Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 0.5 ng per injection. This is the
amount of analyte which will give a peak whose height is approximately five times the baseline noise.
2. Sampling procedure
2.1. Apparatus
2.1.1. A personal sampling pump that can be calibrated to within ± 5% of the
recommended flow rate with the sampling device in line.
2.1.2. Glass fiber filters, 37-mm diameter, Gelman Type A, or equivalent.
2.1.3. Cassette filter holder for 37-mm filters, Millipore M000037A0, or equivalent.
2.2. Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3. Sampling technique
2.3.1. Immediately before sampling, remove the plastic plugs from the cassette.
2.3.2. Attach the cassette to the sampling pump with flexible tubing.
2.3.3. Attach the cassette vertically in the employee's breathing zone in such a manner
that it does not impede work performance.
2.3.4. After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the cassette and seal with
plastic plugs.
2.3.5. Wrap each cassette end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.6. Record the air volume for each sample, and list any possible interferences.
2.3.7. Submit at least one blank for each set of samples. Handle the blank in the same
manner as the samples, except no air is drawn through it.
2.3.8. Submit bulk samples for analysis in a separate container.
2.4. Extraction efficiency
Twenty-four glass fiber filters were each liquid spiked with 40 µL of a 2.442 mg/mL
thiophanate-methyl standard. After drying, six of the glass fiber filters were each
extracted with 5 mL of acetonitrile, shaken for 30 min and then analyzed as in section 3.
The results are listed in the following table.
Table 2.4. Extraction Efficiency
|
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Sample # |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
Ex1 |
97.68 |
92.46 |
94.7 |
Ex2 |
97.68 |
91.93 |
94.1 |
Ex3 |
97.68 |
93.36 |
95.6 |
Ex4 |
97.68 |
87.78 |
89.9 |
Ex5 |
97.68 |
85.45 |
87.5 |
Ex6 |
97.68 |
96.95 |
99.3 |
|
|
|
Average = |
93.5 |
2.5. Retention efficiency
The remaining 18 glass fiber filters from above had 240 L of humid air (~80% relative
humidity) drawn though them. Six of the filters were then each extracted with 5 mL of
acetonitrile, shaken for 30 min and then analyzed as in section 3. The results are listed
in Table 2.5. The rest of the filters were kept, 6 in a drawer at ambient temperature and
6 in a freezer, for storage studies.
Table 2.5. Retention Efficiency
|
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Sample # |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
R1 |
97.68 |
95.01 |
97.3 |
R2 |
97.68 |
95.93 |
98.2 |
R3 |
97.68 |
99.89 |
102.3 |
R4 |
97.68 |
94.67 |
96.9 |
R5 |
97.68 |
99.18 |
101.5 |
R6 |
97.68 |
103.4 |
105.9 |
|
|
|
Average = |
100.4 |
2.6. Sample storage
After 5 days of storage; 6 samples, 3 from ambient storage and 3 from freezer storage,
were each extracted with 5 mL of acetonitrile, shaken for 30 min and then analyzed as in
section 3. The remaining samples were extracted and analyzed after 8 days of storage. The
results are given in the following Tables.
Table 2.6.1. Ambient Storage
Days |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Stored |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
5 |
97.68 |
97.63 |
99.9 |
5 |
97.68 |
96.05 |
98.3 |
5 |
97.68 |
104.51 |
107. |
8 |
97.68 |
98.16 |
100.5 |
8 |
97.68 |
96.32 |
98.6 |
8 |
97.68 |
89.55 |
91.7 |
|
|
|
Average of 5 days = |
101.7 |
|
|
Average of 8 days = |
96.9 |
Table 2.6.2 Freezer Storage
Days |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Stored |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
5 |
97.68 |
96.25 |
98.5 |
5 |
97.68 |
96.97 |
99.3 |
5 |
97.68 |
102.3 |
104.7 |
8 |
97.68 |
97.14 |
99.4 |
8 |
97.68 |
98.24 |
100.6 |
8 |
97.68 |
97.52 |
99.8 |
|
|
|
Average of 5 days = |
100.8 |
|
|
Average of 8 days = |
99.9 |
2.7. Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1. The recommended air volume is 240 L.
2.7.2. The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.
2.8. Interferences (sampling)
It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection of thiophanate-methyl.
Any suspected interference should be reported to the laboratory.
2.9. Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.1. Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that it will not interfere with work performance or employee safety.
2.9.2. Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area being sampled.
3. Analytical procedure
3.1. Apparatus
3.1.1. A balance capable of weighing to the nearest tenth of a milligram. A Mettler HL52 balance was used in this evaluation.
3.1.2. A mechanical shaker.
3.1.3. An HPLC with a UV detector. A Hewlett Packard 1090 liquid chromatograph with a
diode array detector was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4. An HPLC column capable of separating thiophanate-methyl from any interferences.
A 5 µm Hypersil ODS 100 mm x 2.1 mm column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.5. An electronic integrator, or some other suitable means for measuring detector
response. The Hewlett-Packard (HP) 1090 Chem Station was used in this evaluation.
3.1.6. Volumetric flasks and pipets various sizes.
3.1.7. Scintillation vials, 20-mL.
3.1.8. Vials, 2-mL.
3.2. Reagents
3.2.1. Acetonitrile, HPLC grade.
3.2.2. Water, HPLC grade.
3.2.3. Thiophanate-methyl. An EPA standard # 6671 with a purity of 99.7% was used in this evaluation.
3.3. Standard preparation
Prepare thiophanate-methyl stock standards by weighing 10 to 14 mg of
thiophanate-methyl. Transfer the thiophanate-methyl to separate 10-mL volumetric flasks,
and add acetonitrile to the mark. Make working range standards of 0.5 to 25 µg/mL by
pipet dilutions of the stock standards with acetonitrile. Store stock and dilute standards
in a freezer.
3.4. Sample preparation
3.4.1. Transfer the glass fiber filter to a scintillation vial.
3.4.2. Add 5.0 mL of acetonitrile to each vial and seal with a Teflon-lined cap.
3.4.3. Shake the vials for 30 minutes on a mechanical shaker.
3.4.4. Transfer the sample to a 2-mL vial for use in an HP autosampler
3.5. Analysis
3.5.1. Instrument conditions
Column: |
5 µm Hypersil ODS, 100 mm x 2.1 mm |
Oven temperature: |
40°C |
Mobile phase: |
30% acetonitrile |
|
70% water |
Flow: |
0.3 mL/min |
Wavelengths: |
266 nm and 208 nm |
Injection volume: |
1.0 µL |
Retention time: |
3.46 min |
3.5.2. Chromatogram (Figure 2.)
3.6. Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1. Any collected compound having a similar retention time to that of thiophanate-methyl is an interference.
3.6.2. HPLC conditions may be varied to circumvent interferences.
3.6.3. Retention time alone on a single column is not proof of chemical identity.
Analysis by an alternate HPLC column, comparison of wavelength responses or confirmation
by mass spectrometry are additional means of identification.
3.7. Calculations
3.7.1. Construct a calibration curve (Figure 3.) by plotting detector response versus
concentration (µg/mL) of thiophanate-methyl.
3.7.2. Determine the µg/mL of thiophanate-methyl in each sample and blank from the
calibration curve.
3.7.3. Blank correct the sample by subtracting the µg/mL found in the blank from the
µg/mL found in the sample.
3.7.4. Determine the air concentration by using the following formula.
mg/m3 = |
(µg/mL in sample) × (extraction volume, mL) (air volume, L) × (extraction efficiency, decimal) |
3.8. Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1. Avoid skin contact and air exposure to thiophanate-methyl.
3.8.2. Avoid skin contact with all solvents.
3.8.3. Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendation for further study
This method should be fully validated.
Figure 1. UV Scan of Thiophanate-methyl
Figure 2.
Chromatogram of Thiophanate-methyl
Figure 3. Calibration Curve
5. References
5.1. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances 1985-86 Edition; U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services: Cincinnati, OH, 1987; DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No.
87-114, p 313.
5.2. Farm Chemicals Handbook; Berg, Gordon L. Ed.; Meister: Willoughby, Ohio, 1986; p C231.
5.3. Merck Index, 10th ed.; Windholz, Martha Ed.; Merck: Rathway, N.J., 1983; pp 1339-1340.
|