Commercial manufacturers and products mentioned in this method are for descriptive use only and do not constitute endorsements by Division of Physical Measurements and Inorganic
Analyses 1. Introduction This method describes the collection and analysis of airborne chlorine
in the workplace. It is applicable for both
Chlorine was previously determined using A method was developed by OSHA during the early 1980s which collected chlorine in a sulfamic acid solution and samples were analyzed using an ion specific electrode technique. The sulfamic acid collection and residual chlorine ion specific electrode (RCE) analysis has been evaluated (8.3.) and has shown an acceptable level of precision and accuracy for the determination of chlorine in workplace atmospheres. Another evaluation by an independent laboratory has also been conducted (8.4.). 1.2. Principle The sampling method is based on a previous report of chlorine
collection in sulfamic acid solutions (8.5.). The analytical method is
based on iodometric measurements of chlorine using a RCE. An iodide
and a buffer reagent are added to the sulfamic
Cl2 + 2I » -----> 2Cl » + I2 The iodine concentration formed after the reaction is indirectly measured by the RCE and is equal to the chlorine concentration before reaction. This reaction takes place in an acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer. This buffer provides the optimal pH range for the reaction (8.6.). 1.3. Advantages and Disadvantages
1.3.2. No sample elution or desorption is required because the sample is collected in a liquid medium. 1.3.3. Collected samples are stable for at least 30 days before analysis. 1.3.4. The analytical equipment is inexpensive. 1.3.5. One disadvantage of this method is the use of a liquid in midget fritted glass bubblers (MFGB) to collect samples. Spillage or breakage can occur if precautions are not taken. 1.4. Properties (8.2., 8.7.) Chlorine (CAS No.
Chlorine reacts readily with metals, and by substitution or addition with a wide variety of organic compounds. 1.5. Uses Chlorine is used primarily as a bleaching agent or for chlorination of various organic compounds. Some industrial operations which have the potential for chlorine exposures are (8.2.):
2. Working Range and Detection Limits
2.2. Qualitative and quantitative detection limits of 0.01 and 0.1 µg/mL, were estimated during validation studies and calculates to 0.25 and 2.5 µg per sample, respectively. Validation studies conducted over the concentration range of 0.56 to 2
ppm OEi = ¦ [ |mean biasi | + 2CVi] + 100% where i is the respective sample pool being examined. 4. Interferences Strong oxidizing agents including iodate, bromine, cupric ion, and manganese dioxide have been reported to interfere during analysis (8.6.). These agents may react with the KI and produce a positive interference. It has also been reported that silver and mercuric ion concentrations above 10 to 20 µg/mL in the sampled solution will also interfere with the analysis (8.6.) by poisoning the RCE. However, concentrations of this magnitude may be unlikely when sampling for chlorine in the workplace. Reduced sulfur-containing compounds (i.e. methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide) and sulfur dioxide have been reported as negative interferences (8.4.). These compounds apparently inhibit the recovery of chlorine from the sulfamic acid solution. Particulate (i.e. hypochlorites, trichloroisocyanuric acid) which may break down to free chlorine in the sulfamic acid solution are a positive interference. Particulate may be excluded from the sulfamic acid solution by using a Teflon prefilter during sampling. 5. Sampling
5.1.2. Personal sampling pumps capable of sampling within ¦5% of the recommended flow rate of 1 L/min are used. 5.1.3. Midget fritted glass bubblers (MFGBs) 5.1.4. Shipping vials: Scintillation vials, 5.1.5. A stopwatch and bubble tube or meter are used to calibrate pumps. 5.1.6. Various lengths of PVC tubing are used to connect bubblers to the pumps. 5.1.7. If any particulate may present an interference, a prefilter is attached to each bubbler such that sampled air enters the prefilter first. The prefilter should consist of:
Assemble the prefilter such that sampled air enters the PTFE filter first and the plastic support pad faces the MFGB. 5.2. Sampling Procedure
5.2.2. Place 10 to 15 mL of 0.1% sulfamic acid solution in an MFGB. Connect the MFGB (and prefilter if necessary) to a calibrated sampling pump. If a prefilter is necessary, use a minimum amount of tubing to connect the MFGB and prefilter together. Place the sampling device in the breathing zone of the employee. 5.2.3. Sample at a flow rate of 1 L/min. For STEL determinations, a minimum sampling time of 15 min is recommended. 5.2.4. For measurements of TWA exposures, sample up to 240 min. Take enough samples to cover the shift worked. 5.2.5. Transfer the collection solution into a 20-mL glass
scintillation vial. Rinse the bubbler with 2 to 3 mL of fresh
sulfamic acid solution and transfer the rinsings into the sample
vial. Place the 5.2.6. Prepare a blank solution by taking 10 to 15 mL of the
sulfamic acid solution not used for collection and transfer to a
5.2.7. If a prefilter was used, the filter can be submitted for analysis of available chlorine. Immediately after sampling, remove each filter from it's cassette and place in individual vials containing about 5 mL of fresh 0.1% sulfamic acid solution. Also prepare a blank filter/sulfamic acid solution and then seal all vials as mentioned in Section 5.2.5. 5.2.8. Request chlorine analysis on the OSHA 91A form. If
prefilters are submitted, request the filters are analyzed for total
available chlorine using OSHA stopgap method 5.2.9. Ship the samples to the laboratory using appropriate packing materials to prevent breakage. 6. Analysis
6.1.2. Care should be exercised when using laboratory glassware. Chipped pipettes, volumetric flasks, beakers, or any glassware with sharp edges exposed should not be used. 6.1.3. Pipetting is always done using a pipetting bulb, never by mouth. 6.2. Equipment
6.2.2. Millivolt meter, capable of relative mV or concentration readings (Model EA 940 Expandable Ionanalyzer, Orion Research Inc.). 6.2.3. Laboratory glassware including Class A volumetric flasks, pipettes, beakers, graduated cylinders, etc. 6.2.4. Beakers, disposable plastic. 6.2.5. Analytical balance (0.01 mg). 6.3. Reagents - All reagents used should be reagent grade or better.
6.3.2. Sulfamic acid solution, 0.1%: Dissolve 1.0 g sulfamic acid (NH2SO3H) in DI H2O2 and dilute to 1 L. 6.3.3. Potassium iodide (KI), 0.5 M: Dissolve 20.75 g KI in DI H2O and dilute to 250 mL. The solution should be prepared daily. 6.3.4. Buffer reagent, 6.4 M acetic acid/1.8 M sodium acetate: Dissolve 37.1 g sodium acetate in 100 mL of DI H2O. Add 92 mL of glacial acetic acid and dilute the solution to 250 mL using DI H2O. This buffer is acidic, having a pH of about 4.7. Prepare monthly. 6.3.5. Stock Solution: Dissolve 0.500 g potassium iodate in DI H2O and dilute to 500 mL in a volumetric flask. This solution is equivalent to 1,000 µg/mL chlorine. Prepare every 6 months. 6.4. µ Preparation
6.4.2. Working µs are prepared by diluting aliquots of the
100-, 10-, and
Prepare the working µs the same day the analysis is performed. Use the following procedure for preparation:
6.5. Sample Preparation
6.5.2 Measure and record each sample volume received. 6.5.3 Place an aliquot of each sample solution into a separate 50-mL volumetric flask. It is recommended to take the majority of the solution for those air samples having less than 60-L air volumes (i.e. STEL or ceiling samples). If necessary, a duplicate analysis can be conducted using the remaining aliquot; however, sensitivity may be significantly decreased.
6.5.4. React each aliquot with KI and prepare for analysis using the following steps:
6.6. Analytical Procedure
6.6.2. Place the electrode into a disposable plastic beaker
containing 6.6.3. Analyze the µs and samples according to the SOP (8.10.). Take a fresh aliquot from the volumetric flasks and prepare as mentioned in Section 6.4. each time a µ is analyzed. Using a relative reading of 0 mV for the 1 µg/mL and equipment mentioned in Section 6.2., typical µ readings and differences in mV values are shown below:
6.6.4 Always rinse the residual chlorine electrode with DI H2O and blot dry with a clean dry tissue before placing it in the next solution to be analyzed. 6.6.5 Analyze a µ in the concentration range of the samples after every fourth or fifth sample and at the end of the analysis. If a sample reading indicates the concentration is greater than the largest µ, dilute the unreacted sample to bring the concentration within the analytical range:
Do not dilute any reacted samples into the analytical range. 7. Calculations
7.2 The total µg chlorine for each sample or blank is calculated as:
where: 7.3 Each sample is blank-corrrected and the air concentration is calculated to determine chlorine exposure using the following equation:
7.4. Reporting Results Results are reported to the industrial hygienist as ppm chlorine. 8. References
8.2. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health:
Criteria for a Recommended µ -- Occupational Exposure to
Chlorine (DHEW/NIOSH Pub. No. 8.3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Tecnical Center: Chlorine in Workplace Atmospheres - Backup Report (ID-101) by J. Ku. Salt Lake City, UT. Revised 1991. 8.4. National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream
Improvement, Inc.: A Laboratory Evaluation of the Sulfamic
Acid-Iodometric Method for Determining Chlorine in Pulp Bleaching Area
Workplace Atmospheres (Special Report No. 8.5. Takeuari, J. et al.: Measurement of Chlorine in the Atmosphere. Osen Kenkyu (Air Pollution Research) 9(2): 210 (1974). 8.6. Orion Research, Inc.: Residual Chlorine Electrode, Model 9970 Instruction Manual. Cambridge, MA: Orion Research, Inc., 1976. 8.7. Fassett, D.W., ed.: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 2nd rev. ed., Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1963. 8.8. Rando, R.J., and Y.Y. Hammad: A Diffusive Sampler for
Gaseous Chlorine Utilizing an Aqueous Sulfamic Acid Collection Medium
and Specific Ion Electrode Analysis. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg.
5(10): 8.9. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Technical Center: Dilution Effect Study by J. Ku. Salt Lake City, UT. 1991 (unpublished). 8.10. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Technical Center: µ Operating Procedure - Ion Specific Electrodes. Salt Lake City, UT. In progress (unpublished).
|